Technical-Legal Solution
Digital Informed Consent
Transform a vulnerable document into a secure, traceable and defensible process.
Contact usLegal Security
Evidentiary effectiveness in litigation with unalterable digital evidence and time stamping.
Operational Efficiency
Elimination of physical files and full optimization of operational workflows.
Patient Experience
Real understanding and transparency in the patient's decision-making process.
“Information without understanding is not informed consent: it is, at best, uninformed assent”
Dr. Javier Tuero 2025
Value Proposition
What does Iuscore Digital Informed Consent offer?
More understanding for the patient. More protection for the institution.
Digital Informed Consent turns a signature into a verifiable process. It helps patients understand their procedure and gives institutions traceable evidence that strengthens legal certainty and quality of care.
Request a DemoMultimedia information
Videos and graphics that support real understanding.
Advanced electronic signature
Full compliance with legal regulations.
Evidentiary proof
Metadata and records that support the act and its context.
Verifiable authorship
We validate the identity of the person granting consent reliably.
Understanding verification
We reliably validate that the patient understood the information provided.
Document integrity
We prove that the content was not altered or manipulated afterwards.
Reflection time
We record the actual time the patient had to decide before signing.
Reliable time stamp
Certain date and time verifiable by trusted third parties or time stamps.
Enabled revocability
We provide the ability to revoke as simply and securely as it was originally granted.
Process record
We record full traceability of the dialogue, accesses and actions performed on the platform.
Conservation and retrievability
We provide protected storage and the ability to retrieve it intact upon any request.
Personalized content
Adapted specifically to the patient's needs and the type of intervention.
Current Diagnosis
The failure of paper-based informed consent
of patients do not read the information contained in the forms they sign
do not understand the information, even when they have read it
cannot repeat the main risks of the surgery they are about to undergo
do not know the exact nature of the procedure they will undergo
Systematic studies. Kizer & Blum, 2005. National Quality Forum.
Operational risk
Lost paper, incomplete forms, missing signatures, scattered documentation, search and filing times.
Legal risk
The signature does not prove the process. In a conflict, the institution must prove clear information, opportunity, understanding and informed decision.
Reputational risk
Poorly managed consent affects patient trust and exposes the institution even when the medical act was correct.
“Paper can document that someone signed. A well-designed digital environment can also prove how information was provided, what was made available, when it was accessed, whether the patient understood it and whether the document remained intact.”
Current Consent
CID Process
Consent is valid when:
The patient received adequate information.
The patient effectively understood it.
The patient had time to decide.
The patient expressed acceptance.
That does not happen in an instant. It happens in a process.
Judicial View
The law does not only require a signature. It requires being able to demonstrate:
“Courts do not discuss the medium. They discuss whether the process existed and can be proven.”
“Having a signed document is not the same as being able to defend it”
We were born with an entrepreneurial spirit and the firm conviction that law must evolve at the pace of technology. IusCore is a LegalTech innovation center dedicated to providing legal support solutions that simplify our clients' administration and ensure understanding and access for the end user. We combine formal legal knowledge with the fluidity of the digital environment.
Technology at the service of the physician-patient relationship
The CID Process does not replace the in-person physician-patient relationship. It replaces the way informed consent is instrumented: it changes paper, deaf and mute as evidence, for a technology capable of answering how, when, what and in what way that process occurred.
In that in-person encounter, it remains essential that there be:
Understanding: involves grasping the patient's perspective, emotions and context, not only emotionally but also cognitively.
Communication: it is essential that the professional convey to the patient that they have understood their situation and emotions.
Therapeutic action: clinical empathy translates into concrete actions aimed at the patient's well-being.